10 Facts Gail Wishes Other Authors Knew About Writing Upper Class Victorian Clothes
1. Gown = Bodice + Skirt
|Ball Gown 1900-1905 The Metropolitan Museum of Art|
Most gowns and dresses were in two or more parts:
- the top (or bodice)
- the bottom (or skirt/overskirt/underskirt+overskirt)
The two were sewn (yes on the wearer), tied, or hooked together. (This continued into the Edwardian era.)
Ball gown and day dress, 1865 Robe à Transformation The Metropolitan Museum of Art
This lead to transformation outfits (AKA Robe à Transformation):
Same skirt, different bodice, dictating different occasions and allowing for double use.
Godeys July 1872 Fig. 12 Low muslin bodice for a white French muslin dress, trimmed with lace and colored ribbon brows. Fig. 14 Pink silk bodice far an evening dress, made with plaited bertha, edged by points bound with satin; a ruche of illusion inside of neck and sleeves. Fig. 15 Ladies drawers, made of muslin or linen, trimmed with tucks, tatting insertion, and tape trimming. Fig. 16 Piece to wear over a surprise dress of black grenadine, made of blue China crape, trimmed with white lace.
2. Lots of Layers
There is usually an article of clothing both under the corset and over the corset.
Chemise 1876 and Combination 1890s both via The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Slip 1900-1908 and Petticoat 1909-1911 both via The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Under, depending on time and class, was called a…
- petticoat (which, as the name “small coat” implies had a top part like a slip as well as a bottom part)
Corset Cover 1864-1868 and Camisol 1895-1905 both via The Metropolitan Museum of Art
|Corset Cover 1900 The Metropolitan Museum of Art|
Over was usually called a camisole (yes called same thing as above) or a corset cover.
Then the bodice of the dress, that’s so long as there wasn’t also a chemisette/collarette (which is a little like a Dickey) required for day (see next section #3). Agatha refers to her collarette as her “lace tuck.”
Godeys July 1872 Ladies’ corset, made of fine linen, and edged with a narrow Valenciennes lace around the neck. Ladies’ chemise, made tightly gored, with puffs set in the front from the neck down, insertion and edging around the neck and sleeves.
Godeys Nov 1872 Corset cover for lady, made of fine linen, and trimmed with medallions of embroidery and lace. The sleeves are trimmed to correspond.
3. Detachable Sleeves
Sleeves could be detachable (like those worn by bakers to protect the bottom of their sleeves from flour) and were called undersleeves.
|Chemisette, Undersleeves, and Handkerchief 1860s The Metropolitan Museum of Art|
Godeys Oct 1872 Open habit shirt and sleeves, made of fine muslin ruffles plaited, and embroidered insertion; and Undersleeves and collarette, made of muslin, embroidered and trimmed with Valenciennes lace; Godeys Sept 1872 Collar and under sleeve, made of linen tucks and narrow ruffles; the collar is to be worn with a surplice dress.
In the 1890s there was a brief fad for cage sleeve supports as well.
|Sleeve Supports 1890s The Metropolitan Museum of Art|
4. Colorful Stockings
Stockings 1870 and 1880-1899 both via The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Stockings could be very colorful and were held up with garters (not a garter belt), or garter straps which were attached to the corset and went down over the drawers and bottom part of the chemise often causing them to bunch up.
Garter 1875-1825 and Waist Cincher 1908 both via The Metropolitan Museum of Art
|Stockings 1860s The Victoria & Albert Museum|
5. Drawers: To Split or Not to Split?
Split drawers appear in the late 1840s and continue through the 1910s but drawers were also sewn closed during the Victorian Era.
During the Regency Era evidence suggests drawers were not split, but then, corsets were so short drawers didn’t need to be split as the waistband rarely tucked tightly under the corset.
Godeys Sept 1872 Ladies drawers trimmed with rows of insertion and tucks, finished by a lace edging.
|Split Drawers 1900s The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston|
|Split Underwear 1916 The Metropolitan Museum of Art|
A further note on drawers:
In England, even during their surge in popularity in Europe, women did not wear pantalettes (ankle length drawers) only young girls.
Later period knickerbockers were shorter and more practical than drawers but did not entirely replace them.
Bloomers is a term not really used in England until after 1910 (Amelia was American).
6. They Stuffed
|Bust Improvers 1890s Whitaker Auctions|
Bust improvers were introduced in the 1880s, so yes, the Victorians stuffed.
7. Leather Undies
In the 1860s some undergarments were made of chamois leather, for added support, and layered over cloth.
I had a hard time finding a picture of this, although written evidence abounds, but here are some leather stays from the time.
8. Stays Please!
1876 Corset “Queen Bess” The Metropolitan Museum of Art; 1890s Summer Corset The Victoria & Albert Museum
|Corset 1897-1899 The Metropolitan Museum of Art|
Speaking of which, corsets were never talked about in public. If for some reason they had to be mentioned (between ladies of the same age, or in written form), they would be referred to as stays or (better) foundation garments.
The word corset appears to be mainly used in late period advertisements. Whether there was a recognized difference between the two terms at the time is unclear.
|8 From the 1897 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Catalog|
Godeys Nov 1872 Waist for child of a year old, to button skirts on, made of white muslin, trimmed with worked edging. Ladies chemise yoke and sleeves, made of insertion and tucks edged with lace.
Knitted waist for a child.
9. Maid Required
With the exception of some tea gowns and carriage dresses worn, if a lady was daring enough, without stays, it was actually very hard for an upperclass woman to dress herself (or undress, for that matter).
(Yes, I’m aware of the recreationest YouTubes out there claiming this isn’t true (but note her dresses button up the FRONT and she is very relax laced). Frankly, I can get into my own full Victorian (hooks and eyes up the back), but I’m never laced tight, I’m never sewn in, and I’m never fully period accurate, because… I’d need a maid!)
Yes, if you are flexible you can button up the back of your own bodice, or even lace your own corset, but most gowns were custom designed to go over a tighter lacing and that requires a dresser or lady’s maid (unless you’re wicked strong and flexible).
Speaking of which, corset laces are pulled tight to either side, not straight back. Images like the one above are a joke and the technique would not be effective. And yes it is entirely possible to lace your own corset.
10. Occasion Dressing
Gowns had designated times and places they could be worn: from sportswear specific to event specific to occasion specific to time of day.
This changed throughout the Victorian era.
Dressing Gown early 1870s versus Tea Gown 1898-1901 both via The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Dressing gown intended to be seen only by a lady’s maid and possibly husband. Tea gown worn informally about the house seen by staff and family but not visitors unless very intimate.
Here’s a short list from Gail’s memory (a lady did not need to actually have one of each!):
nightgown, peignoir, wrapper, negligée, night-rail, dressing gown, morning dress, tea gown, day dress, walking dress, promenade ensemble, visiting gown, afternoon dress, dinner dress, evening dress, ball gown, reception gown, court dress, wedding dress, opera dress, fancy dress, masquerade costume, swimwear, ice skating ensemble, tennis wear, riding habit, bicycling ensemble, croquet dress, hunting outfit, shooting outfit, country dress (the tweeds), picnic ensemble, travel gown, carriage dress.
Shocking Lady Cricters Punch 1892 (via Project Gutenberg) and Walking Ensemble 1865 The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Plus many of the same in various shades of mourning (full mourning, half mourning, and mauves for extended mourning for the pious).
Evening Dress and matched Shoes 1889 The Metropolitan Museum of Art
The lower classes usually had about three dresses: a working dress (sometimes this could be a uniform or livery), a day dress (for home activities usually worn covered with a pinafore or apron), and Sunday Best.
Much of the same holds true for a man
Which is to say:
- He had lots of clothing in multiple parts some of which hooked together so it wouldn’t shift around.
- He wore many layers.
- There were such things as chest and calf improvers (padding).
- He might have had chamois leather undergarments.
- Men’s undergarments were not talked about in public.
- He needed someone to dress him, which is why even bachelors kept a “man” (AKA valet). What Jeeves calls a “gentleman’s personal gentleman.”
|Leather Underwear For Men|
This post originally appeared in Retro Rack.
Yours with a new clothing rack for the new office…
- Want more sneak peeks and behind the scenes info? This stuff goes to my Chirrup members, because I love them bestest. Sign up here.
- Not into newsletters? Get only new releases by following Gail on Amazon or BookBub!
- Coop de Book for November 2019 is The Lady’s Guide to Celestial Mechanics by Olivia Waite.
Reticence: The forth and final Custard Protocol Book!
Bookish and proper Percival Tunstell finds himself out of his depth when floating cities, spirited plumbing, and soggy biscuits collide in this delightful conclusion to New York Times bestselling author Gail Carriger’s Custard Protocol series.
- Meat Cute AKA The Hedgehog Incident (audiobook out for the holidays, digital for Valentine’s day)
- Spring 2020 the next Delightfully Deadly book, featuring Dimity! Title & cover coming soon.
- Need to know what Gail is writing right now? That’s in the Chirrup.
GAIL’S DAILY DOSE
Your Moment of Parasol . . .
Your Infusion of Cute . . .
Ten years of steampunk outfits…
Your Tisane of Smart . . .
Hidden Brain Podcast: Rebel With A Cause (very interesting for artists, authors and other creatives).
Your Writerly Tinctures . . .
I love me some dashes, but I have SERIOUS opinions on them. If I see a flipping closed-up em dash, I lose my tiny mind. It is horrible for both spacing on a printed page & ebook formatting. It is a convention that needs to DIE.
Quote of the Day:
I was once chatting with author friend Alex White in a cafe about a new ridiculous story idea.
A gentleman at the next table said, “I couldn’t help but overhear, that sounds like something Gail Carriger would write. Have you heard of her?”
And I was like, “Well this is awkward.”